Tesla’s 10 millionth EV is halfway to Musk’s $1 trillion payday

Tesla announced Thursday that it has manufactured its 10 millionth electric vehicle, marking a significant inflection point in the carmaker’s growth trajectory and in the mechanics of CEO Elon Musk’s record-breaking compensation agreement. The milestone arrives exactly six years after Tesla produced its one millionth vehicle, a pace that reflects both the company’s expansion into mass-market segments and the intensifying pressure of its production targets through 2035.

The announcement, shared via social media, carries implications far beyond manufacturing capacity. For Musk personally, reaching 10 million vehicles represents progress toward the first of four core “product goals” that unlock the full $1 trillion value of his pay package, which shareholders approved in 2024. By the end of this decade, Tesla must demonstrate achievement across four distinct metrics, each tied directly to Musk’s wealth.

The Four-Part Test for a $1 Trillion Payday

Tesla’s board of directors outlined four separate targets that serve as the condition precedent for Musk to claim the full value of his compensation arrangement. The company must reach 20 million vehicles produced annually, establish 10 million active subscriptions for its “Full Self-Driving” software suite, deploy one million “bots”—a category that remains vaguely defined—and place one million robotaxis on the road. Each represents a distinct business vertical, from core automotive manufacturing through to speculative robotics and autonomous ride-hailing ventures.

With 10 million vehicles now built cumulatively, Tesla has achieved exactly half the vehicle production target. However, the comparison between cumulative and annual output reveals the ambition gap embedded in the 2035 deadline. Tesla has never delivered 2 million vehicles in a single calendar year. Its all-time peak production approaches that figure but falls short. At current sales velocity, the carmaker would need to nearly double its annual output to meet the 20 million vehicle requirement within the timeframe specified.

Musk himself abandoned an earlier public commitment to manufacture 20 million vehicles per year by 2030, a promise he made when growth prospects appeared more robust. That retreat underscores the difficulty of achieving the 2035 targets. Of the four product goals, vehicle production is the closest to being feasible, given Tesla’s existing supply chain and manufacturing footprint.

Full Self-Driving Subscribers and the Subscription Model

Tesla reported just under 1.5 million subscribers to its Full Self-Driving software suite, a metric that carries ambiguity in how it is counted. The company has not explicitly disclosed whether free trial subscriptions count toward the official product goal established by Tesla’s board. If free trials are included in the 1.5 million figure, the actual paid subscriber base could be considerably lower, making the path to 10 million active paid subscriptions steeper than headline numbers suggest.

The FSD business model depends on sustained growth in both Tesla’s installed vehicle base and the conversion rate of owners to paid subscriptions. As Tesla’s growth slows, this conversion challenge intensifies. The company would need to reach a paid subscriber base ten times larger than its current level, while simultaneously maintaining the growth trajectory of vehicle sales that create new potential customers for the software.

Robotaxis and Robotics: Speculative Bets

The robotaxi and “bot” production goals represent the most speculative components of Musk’s compensation conditions. Tesla is only in the earliest stages of building both categories. The company has not yet deployed robotaxis at scale in any market, and its robot program—focused on humanoid machines for manufacturing and service tasks—exists primarily as prototype demonstrations.

These two categories together require Tesla to establish entirely new business lines and manufacturing capabilities from near-zero. The timeline to deliver one million units of each by 2035 demands not only technical breakthroughs but also regulatory approval, supply chain development, and market adoption at unprecedented velocity.

The Profitability Challenge Behind the Production Goals

Read also: TechCrunch Mobility: The Great Robotaxi Regulation Battle · Waymo Resumes San Francisco Robotaxi Service After Brief Operational Pause · Feds Crack Down on Autonomous Vehicles Interfering With Emergency Responders

Beyond manufacturing volume, Musk must also satisfy a financial requirement to access the full pay package: Tesla’s adjusted EBITDA must reach $400 billion by 2035. That target looks increasingly distant as the company’s current adjusted EBITDA hovers near $3.27 billion—meaning Tesla would need to grow its operating profits more than 120-fold in the next eleven years.

The margin pressure is real and mounting. Tesla has relied on aggressive price discounting to maintain sales volume in its core markets, particularly in the United States. The company has also benefited from the sale of regulatory credits to other automakers, a revenue stream that has diminished as other manufacturers ramp their own electric vehicle production. Simultaneously, Tesla is increasing spending on artificial intelligence and robotics—both expensive, uncertain ventures with no guaranteed return on investment.

To reach $400 billion in adjusted EBITDA, Tesla would need to transform from a carmaker with thin operating margins into a highly profitable technology and robotics company. The math depends on successful execution of the very robotaxi and robot businesses that are still in prototype stages. A failure in either domain would make the profitability target mathematically unreachable.

Domestic Weakness Amid Global Expansion

Tesla’s 10 million vehicle milestone masks a more troubling trend in its largest market. U.S. sales declined 13 percent year-over-year in the second quarter, a contraction the company could not offset through price competition or product refreshes. This weakness in its home market forced Tesla to pursue growth in newer territories including Japan, Australia, and Lithuania—countries where Tesla faces different competitive dynamics and regulatory environments.

The erosion of Tesla’s U.S. dominance occurs as major traditional automakers have retreated from the electric vehicle segment. General Motors, Ford, and other incumbents have scaled back EV investments after initial pushes to compete with Tesla proved less profitable than expected. Startup rivals like Rivian and Lucid Motors have burned through billions of dollars while failing to reach meaningful production scale, unable to sustain the growth momentum required to compete against Tesla’s manufacturing expertise and cost structure.

Despite this reduction in direct American competition, Tesla cannot simply rely on its home market to drive the 20 million vehicle target. The company must instead depend on international expansion and continued U.S. market share even as that market contracts. The geographic shift away from America introduces currency risk, tariff exposure, and regulatory complexity that the company did not face when it could achieve growth through domestic sales alone.

BYD’s Challenge to Tesla’s EV Narrative

Tesla’s position as the world’s leading EV producer is complicated by Chinese competitor BYD, which has crossed 17 million “new energy vehicles” produced and sold. However, that figure includes a substantial hybrid category that Tesla does not manufacture. Approximately half of BYD’s output consists of plug-in hybrids rather than pure electric vehicles, a distinction that obscures the direct competitive comparison between the two companies.

Nevertheless, BYD’s scale demonstrates that the addressable market for electrified transportation extends well beyond pure battery electric vehicles. Consumers in China and other markets have embraced hybrid technology as a transitional step, creating demand that Tesla has not captured. If Tesla’s 20 million vehicle target by 2035 is intended to maintain leadership in electrified transportation globally, it must contend with a competitor producing vehicles at a faster absolute rate, even if the product mix differs from Tesla’s pure EV focus.

Timeline Pressure and the Road to 2035

The 11 years remaining until the 2035 deadline represent both opportunity and constraint. Tesla must approximately double its annual production capacity, build entirely new robotaxi and robotics businesses from near-zero, generate 8.5 million more FSD subscribers, and increase its adjusted EBITDA by more than 120 times. Each goal is challenging independently; achieving all four simultaneously requires execution across multiple distinct business domains with no margin for setback or delay.

The company has demonstrated the ability to scale manufacturing far beyond what competitors achieve. What remains uncertain is whether it can do so while maintaining the profitability required by its financial obligation, and whether it can simultaneously establish credible robotaxi and robotics businesses that generate meaningful revenue. The 10 million vehicle milestone represents progress on the most achievable goal. The real test begins now.